Wednesday, October 31, 2012

'Don't Trust The B---- In Apartment 23': James Van Der Beek Fears Halloween, Bans Scary Costumes (VIDEO)

It was time for James Van Der Beek's annual Halloween costume party on "Don't Trust the B---- in Apartment 23," but it wasn't what June expected. It turns out that James is absolutely terrified of Halloween, so he instead throws a "positivity party" and bans all scary costumes. Fans of "Dawson's Creek" got an extra giggle at the joke, considering his character on that show absolutely loved the holiday.

June and Chloe both loved Halloween, but they found themselves sucked into a twisted romantic comedy. It was a revenge ploy by one of James' friends after seeing Chloe's Halloween tradition. She spots one person each year and decides to ruin their lives by the next Halloween. She chose James' friend as her next target, but he turned the tables on her.

Poor June's natural sappy instinct to try and find the good in Chloe pulled her in as the heroine's unlucky-in-love best friend who put her own happiness on a back burner to focus her attention on trying to help Chloe find love. That, unfortunately, left her with the leading man's slovenly best friend as her solace.

On the character development front, a stand-off over his devil costume -- which James found too scary -- led Mark to realize that he doesn't want to be with his girlfriend anymore. Is it one step closer to him finally expressing his feelings for June? Granted, the fact that she changed her shirt in front of him like it was nothing could well mean he's already been relegated to the dreaded "friend zone."

Find out as "Don't Trust the B---- in Apartment 23" continues on Tuesdays at 9:30 p.m. ET on ABC.

TV Replay scours the vast television landscape to find the most interesting, amusing, and, on a good day, amazing moments, and delivers them right to your browser.

Related on HuffPost:

"; var coords = [-5, -72]; // display fb-bubble FloatingPrompt.embed(this, html, undefined, 'top', {fp_intersects:1, timeout_remove:2000,ignore_arrow: true, width:236, add_xy:coords, class_name: 'clear-overlay'}); });

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/31/dont-trust-the-b-van-der-beak-halloween-video_n_2047958.html

etta james ufc on fox evans vs davis fast times at ridgemont high fast times at ridgemont high soylent green phil davis

Monday, October 29, 2012

bird or birds wanted please read carefully - Classified Ad

$75.00 for 1 tame 6-9 month old male or female parrotlet, any color, or $75.00 for a black masked male or female lovebird 6-9 months old, tame fOR$75.00 for a black masked or blue white face.

just one or the other,?A parrotlet?OR?A lovebird/ close enough to beaver falls pa........................ .

I?don't want?any bird at all younger than 6-9 months.

so; I want either?A parrotlet for $75.00?OR?A black faced lovebird for $25.00?fOR???a ?pale blue and white? parakeet for $25.00.?????If your?confused email me. no cage with any needed. but I DO need?him/her brought to me in beaver falls.

?6-9 months old any of the $75.00 ones.........................., no younger.?4 years old.................. no older.

most importantly-------------- I want a pet.

one last one; I like all these the parrotlet and ringneck the most.

?

A? YOUNG RINGNECK PARAKEET..................$75.00 ..........a male............a young male.

Source: http://www.classifiedads.com/birds-ad20450559.htm

mario balotelli jenny mccarthy espn3 kevin youkilis Tropical Storm Debby legend of korra lebron james

Thursday, October 25, 2012

Welcome to Peacemakers Trust | Resources and news ? Lost in ...

Lost in Translation? Civil Society, Faith-Based Organizations and the Negotiation of International Norms

The impact of civil society on transitional justice is complex in part because civil society is composed of a multitude of actors, faith-based and secular, whose preferences for accountability and truth reflect their varying interests and beliefs about justice. Transnational faith-based and secular actors have played a central role in mobilizing support for liberal-legal strategies designed to hold perpetrators of mass atrocities accountable. Local faith-based actors have been resilient to pressure for conformity and have instead played a pivotal role in adapting international accountability norms and embedding them in local practices?

(...more)

Source: http://peacemakers.ca.etherwork.net/bulletins/2012/10/lost-in-translation-civil-society-faith-based-organizations-and-the-negotiation-of-international-norms/

alicia silverstone park slope food coop anchorman sequel safety not guaranteed lifehouse al gore la dodgers

Apple faithful, Android/Windows fans debate iPad Mini on Twitter

The #appleevent, #ipadmini and other hashtags were out in full force, as Apple enthusiasts and others took to Twitter to ooh, aah and zzzzz in reaction to the latest "gorgeous," "amazing" and "magical" iPads -- both the widely anticipated iPad Mini and the surprise iPad fourth-generation models.

NEWS: Apple unveils new iPads

@Nahayan, squarely in Apple's corner, tweeted: "#iPadMini will destroy other tabs!!!", apparently going for Apple Senior VP Phil Schiller's side-by-side comparison of the new 7.9-inch iPad Mini to an Android model.

@Fluny1 lamented, for Windows fans, that it "Looks like Microsoft won't be selling a lot of Surface this year." Microsoft starts shipping the Windows RT edition of the tablet this Friday, Oct. 26.

Some felt bad for those who bought the iPad 3, which debuted just six months ago, now that Apple has introduced a twice-as-speedy full-size model with a new A6X chip.

@Blue_bookworm wrote: "i guess it sucks to own an iPad 3 now.. it's no longer the 'new' iPad. there's already a 4th gen one after 6 months!"

@Spunkdd knows exactly what this feels like: "Pad mini?! And tech specs for iPad 4?...... Whaaat? But I just got the new iPad."

Some users expressed mixed feelings about Apple's products:

@JermaineAranar tweeted: "im so glad I pre-ordered a Surface and still a proud owner of a Windows Phone."

The price of the iPad Mini, starting at ?269 ($329) for a 16GB model with Wi-Fi but no LTE, got under some observers' skin.

@Thecore wrote: "$329 is a bit on the rich side, but they'll sell 'em by the pallet anyway."

@a5kme added: "#iPadMini a bit too pricey! $299 for 16GB WiFi would have been a reasonable yet competitive!"

@KeilaBee1 agreed: "Lol the ppl on the 'hell naw to $329'? Apple doesn't care about us. They know their audience. We ain't it."

The price of the iPad Mini convinced some their decision to go with Android tablets was the way to go:

@Romanintheoink tweeted: "#iPadMini $329 is too high for something pretty darn close to my $199 Kindle Fire. Camera and cult following is not worth $130 difference."

SEE ALSO: iPad mini vs. Nexus 7: Head-to-head tablet comparison

And @NoDanaOnlyZool wrote: "Only thing that you need to know about the #iPadMini, don't bother. google.com/nexus/#/7 #nexus7"

With all the excitement projected by Apple's execs and its home crowd, the company's gadget and computer news (yes, there are new MacBook Pros and iMacs, too) almost drove some to drink. From @Marioarmstrong: "if I had a drink for every time they said the words 'Love, awesome or cool' I'd be plastered."

Though hopefully, no underage drinking: @Drusome2 wrote: "I think the new #iPadmini is definitely little kid sized. #Apple #iPad #xmas," referring to the ability to hold the device in one hand, as displayed by Schiller on stage.

Finally, one observer put the whole frenzy into some perspective:

@abhijitmajumder: "If #iPadMini can put Twitter through such frenzy, mind boggles to imagine the excitement if the miniskirt were launched in our time."

See also:

Apple unveils Fusion Drive for new iMac and Mac mini
Apple iPad mini vs. Apple iPad: We compare Apple's new tablets
Apple iPad mini in pictures
Apple's new iMac line-up tech specs and UK pricing
Apple's new 13in MacBook Pro with Retina display UK pricing and tech specs
Apple iPad mini specs revealed
Apple updates Mac mini
Tim Cook: Apple by the numbers
Apple's predictable iMac mini keynote still had some surprises

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/idg/uk/MacworldUk/~3/_Ud4oejdgpc/story01.htm

passover easter recipes live free or die hard carlos pena amanda bynes arrested f 18 jet crash in virginia beach

Oh, the ease of blaming others in a crisis

When earthquake experts are sentenced for bad predictions and lenders accused of bad calls on mortgages, society needs a reminder that individuals are responsible for their actions.

By the Monitor's Editorial Board / October 25, 2012

The headquarters of mortgage lender Fannie Mae is shown in Washington. The United States filed a fraud lawsuit against Bank of America accusing it of causing taxpayers more than $1 billion of losses by selling thousands of toxic mortgage loans to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Reuters

Enlarge

Anyone purchasing a car these days does more than kick the tires. Buyers can easily find second opinions, from auto mechanics to Internet reviews. Such diligence is part of being responsible for one?s actions.

Skip to next paragraph

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

Yet that fundamental idea of taking personal responsibility in a risky venture can easily be thrown to the winds in times of tragedy, such as a natural disaster or a financial crisis. Blaming others then becomes the norm.

A few recent court cases illustrate the point.

One is last week?s sentencing in Italy of six seismologists and an ex-official to six years in prison on charges of manslaughter for their alleged failure to predict a 2009 earthquake that left more than 300 people dead.

The seven men were convicted of ?inexact, incomplete, and contradictory? information about the risks posed by tremors in the weeks before the magnitude-6.3 quake. No one was charged for not following standards in building houses with quake-resistant materials.

That case is being compared to a string of lawsuits in the United States against banks for allegedly failing to reveal the quality of home mortgages sold to investors as securities.

The latest suit, brought by the US Justice Department, charges officials at Bank of America and its subsidiary, Countrywide, with not providing adequate information to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac about home loans sold to the mortgage giants between 2007 and 2009.

In other words, Fannie and Freddie, two of the world?s largest financial institutions, were allegedly duped by the bank after deciding not to ?kick the tires? ? or review the mortgages themselves to see if they might be shaky investments.

In a similar suit against JPMorgan Chase, the biggest US bank, the government claims the bank ?failed to fully evaluate the loans, largely ignored the defects that their limited review did uncover, and kept investors in the dark about both the inadequacy of their review procedures and the defects in the underlying loans.?

These suits have yet to convince a court of outright lies by big banks in reselling bad mortgages, which would constitute fraud. Like the Italian court case, they instead imply that bank officials should have known that they were passing on information about mortgages that turned out ? in hindsight ? to be hugely risky to the entire financial system.

Wall Street had its own convulsion in 2008 when enough people saw just how many mortgages had been signed by home buyers who likely couldn?t afford them. The financial meltdown has resulted in endless finger-pointing.

Fannie and Freddie themselves are accused of encouraging the easing of mortgage standards during the housing boom. The Federal Reserve, too, is accused of loosening credit too much. Up and down the chain of those involved in home loans, from Congress to home buyers, few people are taking responsibility for contributing to the crisis.

The practical result of this ducking for cover and assigning blame to others is that society finds it difficult to rely on those charged with assessing risk. Experts and officials in charge of problems such as terrorist attacks, natural disasters, or health warnings may decide not to speak out for fear of being sued.

It may be a long time, for example, before seismologists in Italy or elsewhere try to make a best-guess prediction on an earthquake. In the US mortgage industry, banks have become very reluctant to lend for fear of being charged as not being diligent about checking a borrower?s creditworthiness or not providing enough information in the reselling of loans.

When individuals, either in signing a mortgage or buying them in bulk as Wall Street did, don?t take responsibility for due diligence in their choices, it can be difficult to reform institutions or an industry. Fannie and Freddie need major reform, for example, yet they remain in expensive limbo under government care because of wide differences in Washington over who created the mortgage mess.

Many decisions in life require making a difficult call on the outcome. Just ask the recent substitute referees in the National Football League. Yet we can?t let someone off the hook for making a decision that bounces back badly on them. Sometimes assigning blame means pointing a finger back at ourselves.

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/csm/~3/n3krY2y63w0/Oh-the-ease-of-blaming-others-in-a-crisis

morgan freeman cbs sports adam sandler cbs College Football Scoreboard redskins nfl scores

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Richard Mourdock: Even pregnancy from rape something "God intended" (cbsnews)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories News, News Feeds and News via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/257819264?client_source=feed&format=rss

masters 2012 tom watson kawasaki disease resurrection masters tickets one direction tulsa news

National Geographic To Auction Famous Photos, Art

NEW YORK -- National Geographic Society has chronicled scientific expeditions, explorations, archaeology, wildlife and world cultures for more than 100 years, amassing a collection of 11.5 million photos and original illustrations.

A small selection of that massive archive ? 240 pieces spanning from the late 1800s to the present ? will be sold at Christie's in December at an auction expected to bring about $3 million, the first time any of the institution's collection has been sold.

Among the items are some of National Geographic's most indelible photographs, including that of an Afghan girl during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, a portrait of Admiral Robert Peary at his 1908 expedition to the North Pole, a roaring lion in South Africa and the face of a Papua New Guinea aborigine.

Paintings and illustrations include N.C. Wyeth's historical scene of sword-fighting pirates, Charles Bittinger's view of Earth as seen from the moon, and Charles Knight's depictions of dinosaurs and other prehistoric animals.

They are being auctioned "to celebrate our legacy .... and to give people a chance to buy a little part of this great institution's history," said Maura Mulvihill, senior vice president of National Geographic's image and video archives.

"We think of ourselves as the unsung fathers of modern photojournalism," she added. "I don't think people are aware of what a massive instructive archive this is."

Proceeds from the Dec. 6 auction, just weeks before National Geographic's 125th anniversary, will go for the promotion and preservation of the archive and "the nurturing of young photographers, artists and explorers ... who are the future of the organization," Mulvihill said.

National Geographic sponsors and funds scientific research and exploration through its official journal, National Geographic Magazine, which reaches 8.8 million people worldwide in 36 countries and in 27 languages. The society reaches millions more through its National Geographic Channel, books and other sources.

While National Geographic is known today for its photography, early magazines were filled with artwork.

Among the fine art being offered is an oil painting by Tom Lovell of Gen. Robert E. Lee's Civil War surrender at Appomattox. It's expected to fetch $20,000 to $30,000.

"The Duel On The Beach," a painting of two pirates by the American artist N.C. Wyeth, is estimated to sell for $800,000 to $1.2 million. Another Wyeth, "James Wolfe at Quebec," was commissioned to accompany a 1949 article on the general taking Quebec from the French general the Marquis de Montcalm. It has a pre-sale estimate of $30,000 to $50,000.

Steve McCurry's photograph of the Afghan girl carries an $8,000 to $12,000 pre-sale estimate. McCurry has made a special print of the image for the sale, and part of the proceeds from it will be donated to the Afghan Girls' Fund.

There's also Edward Curtis' 40-volume photo portfolio and book, "The North American Indian," believed to have been owned by Alexander Graham Bell. It's estimated at $700,000 to $900,000.

The sale also contains some images that have never been published, including a selection from Herbert Ponting, who produced some of the most enduring images of the Antarctic.

  • In this 1998 photo provided by National Geographic via Christie?s Auction House, Huli Tribesman, in Papua New Guinea are shown. The photo is among a small selection of the National Geographic Society's most indelible photographs that will be sold at Christie?s next month at an auction expected to bring about $3 million. (AP Photo/National Geographic, Jodi Cobb)

  • In this 1969 image provided by National Geographic via Christie?s Auction House, an illustration entitled; ?A Blue Globe Hanging in Space?The Earth As Seen From The Moon,? by Charles Bittinger is shown. The picture is among a small selection of the National Geographic Society's most indelible images that will be sold at Christie?s next month at an auction expected to bring about $3 million.((AP Photo/National Geographic, Charles Bittinger)

  • Robert E. Peary

    This 1908 photo made by an unidentified photographer and provided by National Geographic via Christie?s Auction House, is a portrait of Arctic explorer Adm. Robert E. Peary in Cape Sheridan, Canada. The photo is among a small selection of the National Geographic Society's most indelible photographs that will be sold at Christie?s next month at an auction expected to bring about $3 million.(AP Photo/National Geographic via Christie?s Auction House. (AP Photo/National Geographic via Christie?s Auction House)

"; var coords = [-5, -72]; // display fb-bubble FloatingPrompt.embed(this, html, undefined, 'top', {fp_intersects:1, timeout_remove:2000,ignore_arrow: true, width:236, add_xy:coords, class_name: 'clear-overlay'}); });

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/23/national-geographic-to-au_0_n_2004823.html

anencephaly tesla model x lou gehrig toby mac blue ivy carter photos purple squirrel blade runner

Cloud Atlas | Movie Reviews | Kelly Vance | East Bay Express

In bringing author David Mitchell's labyrinthine Cloud Atlas to the screen, the directorial tag team of Tom Tykwer, Lana Wachowski, and Andy Wachowski was faced with narrative dilemmas revolving around the novel's length (509 pages), its frequently ornate language, and the complexity of its six interlocking plots. It's a pleasure to say the filmmakers not only solved the low overcast problem, but also that their collaboration is one of the few major releases of the season that lives up to its hype.

Don't worry about those six competing novella-size stories getting in each others' way. There's nothing here the mosaic-wise modern media audience can't handle. The best strategy is to relax, drink in the images, put your brain on cruise control (while still listening to the characters), and let the movie sort itself out.

Chronological order matters, at first. The anchor of the piece is the 19th-century tale of a writer whose chance acquaintance with a "savage" stowaway aboard a ship bound for San Francisco from New Zealand changes the history of the world. Then, advancing in time, we witness: a 1930s contest of wills between a young classical music composer and his tyrannical employer, a crotchety maestro; a reporter investigating a malevolent utility company in the 1970s-era Bay Area; the comic predicament of a man imprisoned in a senior living facility in 2012 England; the grim chronicle of a "fabricant" restaurant worker and her unlikely ally in mid-22nd-century Neo-Seoul, Korea; and, finally, a struggle between peaceful villagers and cannibals on the "Big Isle" of Hawaii sometime "After the Fall."

Instead of presenting each story as a discrete nugget, the co-directors interweave the events in a long, careful crescendo of crosscutting. It takes some getting used to, but we're shepherded by the recurrence of actors as well as by the continuity of Mitchell's persistent theme: rebellion against tyranny. The most compelling narrative centers on Sonmi-451 (played by South Korean actress Doona Bae), a disposable, semi-robotic restaurant waitress whose love story with a human named Hae-joo Chang (Jim Sturgess) awakens her conscience and her social responsibility as an Earth dweller.

As the stories unfold, Bae and Sturgess play multiple roles, as do Tom Hanks, Halle Berry, Jim Broadbent, Susan Sarandon, Hugh Grant, Ben Whishaw, David Gyasi, and James D'Arcy in the large cast. Hugo Weaving, nemesis of the Wachowskis' Matrix movies, sticks to villainous parts throughout (his Nurse Noakes is a wonderfully hideous piece of work), but Hanks, Broadbent, and Grant all cross back and forth from protagonist to antagonist, with elaborate changes of makeup.

And yet what we can only call the moral thrust of Cloud Atlas remains consistent. Mitchell's novel plays to the Wachowskis' and Tykwer's strengths as creators of characters in conflict with oppressive hierarchies ? check Run Lola Run, V for Vendetta, The International, etc. The lesson of all six fables: Don't be cowed by bullies and bosses. Link up with like-minded folks and resist. Make them pay. (We'd like to see these three filmmakers produce an intelligent screenplay on the Occupy movement. America's urban protestors appropriated the Guy Fawkes mask from V for Vendetta ? it's time to return the favor.) Other major threads: tattoos, masters versus slaves, the notion that women will not be denied, oceans and shores, violence, and reincarnation. Metaphors rebound on each other. The novel's lustrous prose survives in abridged form. The problem with most sci-fi is its limited ambition. Mitchell's fiction, however, has real substance and a beauty of language to go with its universal humanity.

Hanks' "Dermot Hoggins" cockney accent is awful, but his prosthetic overbite in the Dr. Henry Goose role is somehow ingratiating ? he seems to enjoy playing daffy characters. Ditto Broadbent the old pro, growling and whimpering. Grant's underhanded corporate technocrat Lloyd Hooks bears a disturbing resemblance to the Mittens. Berry convinces as the nosy magazine writer and also as the ultimate keeper of the Kona hearth. Whishaw and D'Arcy, playing unlucky lovers Robert Frobisher and Rufus Sixsmith, provide one of the keys that unlock the chain of coincidences.

Bae and Sturgess may be the unlikeliest of lovers, the subdued-but-studious clone and the guy in the fake-looking "oriental" makeup, but their adventures in the bowels of Neo-Seoul provide the necessary Matrix-style shootouts to go with the elliptical workings of Mitchell's time travels. The Wachowskis directed the two futuristic episodes plus the Adam Ewing sailing ship tale; Tykwer handled the composer, reporter, and old folks' jailbreak stories, and also composed the music score, including "The Cloud Atlas Sextet," Frobisher's elusive main musical cue. It's entirely possible to enjoy Cloud Atlas solely for its spectacular visuals and grandiose play-acting, but anyone wishing to get down to the heart of the myth has only to pick up on Sonmi-451's words: "Our lives are not our own. From womb to tomb we are bound together, past and present."

Source: http://www.eastbayexpress.com/ebx/cloud-atlas/Content?oid=3371999

x factor winner footlocker julia gillard julia gillard pecan pie the hobbit trailer red velvet cake recipe

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Chemical maker Celanese reports lower profit

DALLAS (AP) ? Celanese Corp. said Monday that its third-quarter earnings fell 30 percent as revenue was hurt by lower pricing for some specialty chemical products.

Celanese products are used in paints, adhesives, auto parts, electronics and other goods. The company said the decline was driven mostly by lower prices for products in its acetyl and industrial-specialties businesses, which it blamed on weak economies in Europe and Asia. Sales and prices rose in its consumer-specialties business.

Profit still beat analysts' expectations but revenue was less than expected. Celanese predicted that fourth-quarter earnings would be "modestly higher" than a year earlier.

Net income totaled $117 million, or 73 cents per share, compared with $167 million, or $1.05 per share, in last year's third quarter.

Excluding an income tax provision and other items, the company said it would have earned 93 cents per share, down from $1.27 per share last year on the same basis.

Analysts, who usually exclude one-time charges and gains, expected 90 cents per share, according to FactSet.

Revenue fell 11 percent to $1.61 billion from $1.81 billion a year earlier, below analysts' forecast of $1.70 billion.

The Dallas company said that it expects challenging economic conditions to persist into next year but still looks for fourth-quarter adjusted earnings higher than a year ago. In last year's fourth quarter, the Dallas company earned $56 million, or 35 cents per share.

Shares rose 18 cents to close at $37.44 before the results were released. The stock was unchanged in after-hours trading.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/chemical-maker-celanese-reports-lower-profit-000805203--finance.html

raffi torres michael mcdonald jon jones vs rashad evans earth day 2012 jon jones rashad evans ufc jones vs evans watergate

Gadgets N Gears (Creekmouth, Barking, London, by victoriadoran)

Boooooo to gadget and gears, rip offs merchants taking everyone for a ride and making a fortune from p&p on KGB items. Even if he didn't redeem the vouchers (and get the money) he will have still got ?6 out of everyone who bought p and p to cover purchases.?

Alarm bells were ringing when I was asked to pay postage by money bookers and not PayPal....wish I had listened to my instincts.?
Con merchants.?

Source: http://www.qype.co.uk/review/3348095

barney frank barney frank rob gronkowski kim richards robert hegyes mary louise parker mary louise parker

Space Politics ? Briefly: Sentinel endorses Nelson; the Science Guy ...

Space Politics

Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway?

The Orlando Sentinel endorsed Sen. Bill Nelson (D-FL) for reelection on Sunday over his Republican challenger, Connie Mack IV. The editorial cited Nelson?s role as ?a champion for NASA and Florida?s role in the U.S. space program? in its decision. ?A law he co-authored in 2010 wisely extended the life of the International Space Station and supported the development of commercial spacecraft, both positive developments for Florida and the space program as a whole,? the endorsement stated, a reference to the NASA Authorization Act of 2010.

Bill Nye, aka ?The Science Guy,? will be supporting the Obama reelection campaign Monday night on Florida?s Space Coast. Nye is slated to appear at a watch party in Cocoa, Florida, for the third and final presidential debate. Nye, the CEO of The Planetary Society, is also scheduled to appear Tuesday morning at a roundtable about STEM education at Florida Tech. The roundtable is not an official Obama campaign event, according to a release by the campaign?s Florida staff, but ?it is part of Mr. Nye?s trip in support of the campaign.?

Permalink

How can one be a champion of NASA and be a party to eviscerating it? Ideology trumps logic at the Orlando Sentinel.

On space policy (and in my view the rest of it) there is no alternative but to support Obama. Romney just lies?there is not a single position this year he fills like he cannot modify and then say ?well I never held that position??what a liar. RGO

It?s notable that the Sentinel highlights ISS and commercial cargo/crew, rather than SLS/MPCV, from the 2010 NASA Authorization Act in its endorsement of Nelson.

there is no alternative but to support Obama.

You are in excellent company: Chavez, Putin, the Mullahs, all support Obama. Maybe you should ask, why?

amightywind wrote @ October 22nd, 2012 at 9:37 am

?You are in excellent company: Chavez, Putin, the Mullahs, all support Obama. Maybe you should ask, why??

Not really. When one foreign leader endorses another it is usually in the hopes of pinging people like you?although in Vlad?s case (who is amazingly rational) in large measure I suspect it is because he must view Romney as any sane person does; a person who has no real clue as to the issues of the day?and Putin is really trying to negotiate a path to stabilize Russian/American relations?and stabilize Russia.

The return question is why would you support Romney? An idiot who says he would spend 2 trillion more dollars on the US military without any real reason as to why he can articulate other then the slack jawed comment ?it keeps us strong?

Goofy RGO

It?s notable that the Sentinel highlights ISS and commercial cargo/crew

A classic example of the frog boiling in the pot. The Orlando Sentinel has already accepted defeat in the Constellation Great Game, and looks now to protect more trivial parochial concerns over crony space.

An idiot who says he would spend 2 trillion more dollars on the US military without any real reason as to why he can articulate other then the slack jawed comment ?it keeps us strong?

The cataclysms in the Arab world, Russia?s aggression along its periphery, and, China?s aggression in Tibet, East Turkestan and the South China Sea are the direct result of the withdrawal of US power. No, Mitt is no idiot. But perhaps one who believes he can substitute the lever of US military might with the power his personality is.

(who is amazingly rational)

I just read that our hyper-rational partner in space just shipped those hooligan punk rockers off to the gulag archipelago.

Bill Nye, who inveighed against Obama cuts in planetary science and yet supports the man, is kind of like a battered wife, always going back to the abusive spouse.

? mike shupp wrote @ October 22nd, 2012 at 1:12 pm

C?mon Mark, get serious. Obama probably doesn?t look all that wonderful to people interested in planetary space programs, but Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan are clearly much less attractive. There isn?t anyone IN THE WORLD making the argument that R&R want an improved planetary science program, or even any sort of planetary science program ? not even Romney and Ryan themselves.

You want to make a funny analogy, you ought to go the whole route with it. Bill Nye?s like an abused wife and Obama?s the abuser. And what?s Romney? A self-proclaimed ax murderer.

Mark Whittington wrote:

?Bill Nye, who inveighed against Obama cuts in planetary science and yet supports the man, is kind of like a battered wife, always going back to the abusive spouse.?

Yes. It seems Bill Nye, the Obama Guy, suffers from the space version of Stockholm Syndrome. He also seems to suffer from the mistaken notion that only Democrats support space exploration. Consequently, The Planetary Society writes off potential support (and membership dues) from Republicans who support space exploration. Given the demographics of the country, Republicans could account for up to half of The Planetary Society?s members. But I know more than a few people who have kissed Bill Nye ?goodbye? because of his blatant political bias. I dropped my own membership after growing weary of reading articles in the society?s magazine which contained far too much political content. I was interested in planetary research ? not Leftist propaganda. How much influence does Bill Nye think The Planetary Society will have in the Romney Administration after he (Nye) campaigned (again) for Barack Obama? Ditto for Elon Musk who has been effusive in his praise for President Obama and outspoken in his criticism of Governor Romney. Elections have consequences.

? Vladislaw wrote @ October 22nd, 2012 at 1:41 pm

Actually, Mark supporting people that are never EVER going to give him what he wants, in space funding, is a better example of the battered wife syndrome. Mark got beat up by Griffin and now he wants to get beat up by Romney, in the hopes he will reappoint Griffin to whip mark some more?. a regular political masocist.

? DCSCA wrote @ October 22nd, 2012 at 1:59 pm

@Mark R. Whittington wrote @ October 22nd, 2012 at 12:05 pm

=yawn= The Romney position is clear given his muddled rhetoric along the space coast and dissisive response to Gingrich during the primaries: a dead space program. Re-upping Obama is a holding patter ?til the two-term Clinto presidency beginning in ?16? or initiatives from another power ( go, PRC, GO!) launch out toward Luna.

but Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan are clearly much less attractive.

I think that the public will find Romney and Ryan to be far more moderate than leftist propaganda would have us believe. That said, Mitt is a manager. I hope he sees an agency in need of reform, rather than the political sop it has become.

Bill Nye, who inveighed against Obama cuts in planetary science and yet supports the man

Those cuts were largely self-inflicted by the planetary science community, whose top Decadal priorities were considered by the Administration to be pretty much unaffordable. I think Bill?s Planetary Society, in inveighing against those cuts, has to understand that. That is, it?s one thing to jump up and down and complain about cuts. It?s another thing to argue with the rationale for those cuts. They haven?t done the latter.

Obama has specifically expressed excitement about and interest in planetary astronomy. Why, he was accused in this very forum of taking undeserved responsibility for Curiosity! Have Romney or Ryan ever said such words of support? Don?t think so.

William Mellberg wrote @ October 22nd, 2012 at 1:14 pm

?How much influence does Bill Nye think The Planetary Society will have in the Romney Administration after he (Nye) campaigned (again) for Barack Obama??

That doesn?t seem to affect the U.S. Chamber of commerce, which is a pretty right-wing organization at the top. Some organizations seem to attract people that lean more one way than another. How unusual. Once you start decrying too much right-leaning influence, then I?ll take your concerns seriously.

?Ditto for Elon Musk who has been effusive in his praise for President Obama and outspoken in his criticism of Governor Romney.?

When I Google ?Elon Musk and Mitt Romney?, what comes up first is Mitt Romney slamming Elon Musk?s Tesla car company. Sounds like Romney was picking a fight, but I didn?t see any beyond normal response from Musk. Where are you seeing the supposed criticism?

Mark R. Whittington wrote @ October 22nd, 2012 at 12:05 pm

Bill Nye, who inveighed against Obama cuts in planetary science and yet supports the man, is kind of like a battered wife, always going back to the abusive spouse.>>

the battered ?wife? syndrome is you?you and all the right wing people got hosed by Bush43 and yet you continue to push the rhetoric of that era. You wont admit you got it wrong about Iraq, Cx and all the other failures of the administration; you and others (including Romney) insist that Obama screwed up things that were terminal DURING the Bush administration.

Along the way you have pickedup the habit of misstating things?you were even telling Kolker how an embassy works and for heavens sake?HE IS AT ONE.

RGO

amightywind wrote @ October 22nd, 2012 at 11:32 am

The cataclysms in the Arab world, Russia?s aggression along its periphery, and, China?s aggression in Tibet, East Turkestan and the South China Sea are the direct result of the withdrawal of US power.>>

actually NO they are not.

US power cannot anymore stop local tides and changes then British power could frustrate American will in 1776 or Indian will in 1947 or ?.

The Chinese have as much right to a Monroe doctrine in their region of the world as the US does in ours. What happens in the Spratlys concerning the Spratelys is not a US problem anymore then what happens in Haiti is a Chinese problem.

As for the Arab world. Welcome to true ?regime change?. The Arab world suffered under the bipolar alignment of the US and USSR which kept in place long passed its time the colonial aspects of the region. We supported ?strong men? (as did the USSR) solely on buying their love?the local population be ?darned?.

Now for good and bad the locals are reshaping the map there to suit local desires and IT IS IN THE SPIRIT OF WHAT happened in 1776.

?withdrawal of US Power??20 carrier battle groups would not change the situation in the places you mentioned?all they would do is keep the MIC going.

It is a new world with new realities. RGO

http://nasawatch.com/archives/2012/10/coordinated-fac.html#comments

It is hard to do any better then what Keith does?

Scott Pace and E. Anderson wrote in Space News

??Unfortunately, American leadership is in jeopardy. Today we have a space program befitting a president who rejects American exceptionalism, apologizes for America and believes we should be just another nation with a flag. President Barack Obama has put us on a path that cedes our global position as the unequivocal leader in space. For the first time since the dawn of the Space Age, America has chosen to forgo its own capabilities for putting astronauts into space and instead relies on the Russians. The space shuttle?s planned retirement was known on the day President Obama took office, yet the earliest that Americans will again ride American rockets into space is 2016.?"

this is what kC wrote:

?What a pair of memory-challenged hypocrites.

Its rather odd that Space Adventures CEO Anderson would be party to such comments. in April 2010, when he was Chairman of the Commercial Spaceflight Federation, Anderson is quoted as saying the following about the Obama Administration?s space policy: ?This visionary plan is a master stroke. It?s exactly what NASA needs in order to continue to lead the world in space exploration in the 21st century.? In May 2012, on the occasion of the first launch of the SpaceX Dragon, CSF Chairman Anderson is again quoted, saying ?This is a testament to the viability of the commercial spaceflight industry ? Congratulations to SpaceX for successfully completing the first steps of this demonstration flight. Elon and his team?s success today is an important milestone in achieving a sustainable space program.?

My comments

the people in the Romney campaign are like Romney: liars RGO

? joe wrote @ October 22nd, 2012 at 4:41 pm

William Mellberg wrote @ October 22nd, 2012 at 1:14 pm
?Yes. It seems Bill Nye, the Obama Guy, suffers from the space version of Stockholm Syndrome. He also seems to suffer from the mistaken notion that only Democrats support space exploration. ?

William,

I believe in the past you have alluded to an historical knowledge of space activities (including budgeting) dating back quite a while.

So I have two questions for you. My own after the fact impression of the history of the whole humans vs. robots debate is that the robots only types have been promised (repeatedly by a number of politicians) that if they just support reductions in HSF funding that the money ?saved? would be transferred to the robotics accounts. But that never seems to happen. In fact when HSF funding is cut back the total budget goes down and the robotics program gets hurt as well.

- Am I correct in this?
- If I am correct, how many times have the robots only types played ?Charlie Brown? to some politicians ?Lucy with the football??

Joe asked:

?If I am correct, how many times have the robots only types played ?Charlie Brown? to some politicians ?Lucy with the football???

I cannot give you a specific (numeric) answer. But I tend to agree with your premise.

Personally, I have always been a strong supporter of both robotic and human spaceflight; and I do not think one should suffer at the expense of the other. But I also think robotic missions have always gotten the short end of the budget stick.

Human spaceflight seems to generate the most public excitement and support. But robotic spacecraft have yielded treasure troves of scientific information. When I look at my Astronomy 101 textbook (published in 1969), it is amazing how little was known about our Solar System at the time. Since then, robotic explorers such as Mariner and Voyager and Viking and their successors have added whole chapters where only paragraphs had been written. Moreover, I remember when my Father first became involved with the Surveyor project 50 years ago. At that time, no one could say for sure what the surface of the Moon was like (which, of course, was Surveyor?s mission). When you add the Hubble Space Telescope and the other space observatories to the list, the discoveries become even more impressive. NASA?s robot explorers have done some amazing things!

In any case, I agree with your point. I cannot recall robotics accounts being increased by any reductions in HSF funding. When NASA budgets go down, robotics get hit as much as (if not more than) human spaceflight.

This is why I still support Harrison Schmitt?s proposal of last year calling for the dismantlement of NASA and the creation of a new National Space Exploration Administration:

http://americasuncommonsense.com/blog/category/science-engineering/space-policy/4-new-proposal-for-nasa/

Note these lines in Dr. Schmitt?s proposal:

?The new Agency?s responsibilities should include robotic exploration necessary to support its primary mission. As did the Apollo Program, NSEA should include lunar and planetary science and resource identification as a major component of its human space exploration and development initiatives.?

Given the high cost of human exploration, I believe robotic exploration can and should play an even bigger role in our national space program.

@Joe:

Joe, I might add that Dr. Schmitt?s proposal for a new National Space Exploration Administration was used as the Prologue for his more extensive book about Space Policy. It can be downloaded from his website:

http://www.americasuncommonsense.com/blog/wp-content/pdfFiles/Schmitt_SpacePolicyAndTheConstitution.pdf

HTML-Tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Source: http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/10/22/briefly-sentinel-endorses-nelson-the-science-guy-stumps-for-obama-in-florida/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=briefly-sentinel-endorses-nelson-the-science-guy-stumps-for-obama-in-florida

amber portwood Phyllis Diller Darla Moore newsweek Tony Scott UFC 151 empire state building

Five Things I Wish Mitt Romney Would Say in the Debate

1. ?When Obama misrepresents Romney?s proposals:??I think we can all agree that the person in this room with the most motive to mischaracterize my proposals is Barack Obama. ?He can be very eloquent. ?But one we?ve learned about this President is that the more eloquent he becomes, the less we can trust what he?s saying. ?You learn this in the business world as well. ?Salesmen with a great product to sell will simply give you the logic and the evidence. ?It?s the salesmen who are trying to sell you a raw deal who deliver the most eloquent and exaggerated promises. ?What this President has given us is beautiful promises and a disappointing product.?

Why: Barack Obama is reputedly the most eloquent human being in the history of the planet ever. ?I think rumors of his eloquence have been greatly exaggerated, but there?s no question he delivers a good speech and a good commercial. ?If I were debating Obama, I would want to turn his eloquence against him. ?We all remember the flowery speeches and the over-the-moon promises. ?Plant the seed of doubt that it?s precisely when his words soar that he?s trying to fly over a disastrous reality.?

2. ?When Obama attacks Romney instead of offering a clear plan for his second term: ?A strong President runs on the power of his record. ?A visionary President runs on the power of his agenda for the next four years. ?But this President has sought to purchase reelection by selling the American people a false bill of goods about who I am and what I propose. ?President Obama wants you to be so scared of me that you?re willing to settle for another four years like the last. ?But the American people don?t need to be scared, and they certainly don?t need four more years of a struggling economy. ?Hope and change has been replaced by fear and blame. ?The American people need to be inspired. ?They need to know that their leaders are finally solving problems again and moving this nation forward. ?So every time Barack Obama, instead of setting out clear plans for the future, engages in blame and personal attacks, I think the American people should say to themselves: There he goes again, giving us more attacks when what we need is an agenda.?

Why: This plants in the minds of Americans a powerful response when they see the next attack ad: What happened to hope and change, and wouldn?t a strong President be touting his record and his vision instead of slandering his opponent?

3. ?When Obama references the death of bin Laden: ?What we?re witnessing now around the world is the unraveling of Barack Obama?s foreign policy. ?America made an extraordinary sacrifice in Iraq to stand against dictatorship and for democracy ? and as other nations saw that they too could enjoy freedom and democracy and human rights, they began to stand up against the tyrants in their own lands. ?In some cases, such as Iran and Syria, the President has done nothing meaningful to support those brave people who were rallying for freedom. ?I?m not talking about a new war, but there are many things we can do to stand strong with our allies and stand together against our enemies. ?In a few other cases, such as Egypt and Libya, this President chose to ?lead from behind.? ?But ?leading from behind? is just another way of saying ?following along.? ?And the problem with leading from behind is that you don?t know you?re going. ?Now Egypt and Libya have become hotbeds of terrorist activity ? the kind of terrorist activity that led to the attack on our diplomats and the death of ambassador Stevens.

?President Obama speaks as though he has projected a strong foreign policy. ?But it tells you something that?Vladimir Putin, Hugo Chavez and Raul Castro have endorsed Obama. ?People who want a weak America want Obama to remain in office. ?They understand that, with Obama in office, we will not stand as strongly for Israel. ?In four years this President has never once set foot in Israel, our greatest ally in the region. ?They understand that, with Obama in office, we will be more quick to compromise our values ? such as Vice President Biden saying that he would not ?second guess? China?s one-child policy, which leads to so many forced abortions of girls and even to infanticide. ?They understand that, with Obama in office, America will be burdened by a massive and ever-increasing debt. ?So I would suggest that you not take the advice of Hugo Chavez on whom to vote for.?

4. ?On Benghazi: ?President Obama in our last debate said that he was offended when I criticized his handling of the attack on Americans in Benghazi. ?I didn?t mean to hurt his feelings, but I?m offended when an administration is more eager to lay the blame on an amateur video than it is clearly articulate the nature of our enemy. ?The President claims that he has weakened?al Qaeda, and his administration twisted itself in pretzels to avoid saying that this was a terrorist attack. ?The President sent his ambassador to the UN onto all the Sunday talk shows, and she said the same thing that his press secretary said over and over again: this was a demonstration that arose spontaneously as a result of an American-made video. ?But it wasn?t. ?It was a terrorist assassination of an American ambassador.

?President Obama needs to come clean with the American people that the terrorist networks that would do us harm have only grown stronger in the past four years. ?Our drone strikes have managed to take out some al Qaeda leadership. ?And we can all celebrate that the American military and intelligence services under two Presidential administrations worked long and hard to get bin Laden. ?The President gave the order, and I?m glad he did. ?Of course, after an attack of that magnitude on our country, we go and get bin Laden when the opportunity arises. ?But terrorist networks change and evolve. ?They?re resurgent in places like Pakistan and Yemen and Libya, and we?re seeing countries like Russia and China delivering weapons systems and technologies into the hands of terror-sponsors in Iran and Syria. ?President Obama told us from the beginning that he wanted America to take a humbler role in world affairs. ?Apparently humble meant weak. ?What he?s given the world is a weaker America, and our enemies have prospered in the space that he has given them.?

5. ?On the Economy and Foreign Policy: ?The Obama administration was very clever when it structured Obamacare so that many of the most onerous taxes and regulations would not kick in until after this election. ?What this tells me is, Obama understands that Obamacare is not good for the economy. ?The truth is, we really haven?t seen yet the full economy-killing effects of Obamacare yet. ?We?ve only begun to see a glimpse, and already we have CEOs who are saying that they will not hire because of Obamacare, and companies planning to drop their coverage because of Obamacare, other companies planning layoffs because they will not be able to afford all the additional burdens on their businesses. ?You might say, ?This debate is supposed to be about foreign policy.? ?Well, the economy is the basis of everything we do. ?Without a strong and flourishing economy, our military cannot remain strong for long.

I applaud that President Obama wants to help the poor. ?So do I. ?Compassion compels us all to care for the poor. ?But you do not care for the poor by running the economy into the ground. ?And you do not equip America for a strong foreign policy by saddling it with mountains upon mountains of unsustainable debt.

President Obama is not out to destroy America. ?He just doesn?t know how to fix what?s wrong, and the programs and proposals he has put forward are only going to make matters worse. ?The problem with President Obama is not that he?s a bad person. ?He ran an incredible campaign in 2008, and he has some admirable qualities. ?The problem is that Barack Obama is not the President America needs right now. ?We cannot afford four more years of joblessness, for more years of stagnation, and for more years of weakness on the global stage.?

Source: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/philosophicalfragments/2012/10/22/five-things-i-wish-romney-would-say-in-the-debate/

old school nick swisher jaco san jose sharks humber perfect game ufc 145 fight card ufc145

Monday, October 22, 2012

Legal Battle Heats Up In Wake Of Student Sex Tape Scandal ? CBS ...

PHILADELPHIA (AP) ? A Pennsylvania high school student claims he was unfairly punished after a fellow student secretly recorded him having sex with his girlfriend in a Casablanca hotel during a school trip.

The 16-year-old filed a federal civil rights suit last week against Schuylkill Valley School District, saying his four-day suspension wasn?t appropriate because he did nothing wrong during a Spanish club trip in April.

The student?s suit says he and his then-girlfriend were humiliated when they learned of the recording. All three students were punished after the school learned of the tape.

The student?s suit claims he was punished for actions not prohibited in the school?s code of conduct because the contact wasn?t on school property. A student behavior slip Hemdal signed for the trip acknowledges sexual activity is cause to be sent home.

School officials did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment Monday.

(? Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

Source: http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2012/10/22/legal-battle-heats-up-in-wake-of-student-sex-tape-scandal/

amzn white house correspondents dinner phoenix coyotes bruce irvin charlie st cloud celtics josh hamilton

Membership in Shooting Ranges & Sporting Clays Clubs Increases ...

Scottsdale Gun Club

Membership in Shooting Ranges & Sporting Clays Clubs Increases Over Previous Year

ShooterSurvey.com

ShooterSurvey.com

FERNANDINA BEACH, Fla. --(Ammoland.com)- A recent survey of more than 5,000 shooting enthusiasts conducted on ShooterSurvey.com discovered approximately one third 32 percent of active shooters respondents claim membership at a shooting range or sporting clays club, a six percent increase over the previous year?s survey results.

While the growth is encouraging, the news many clubs might want to focus on are the reasons why 68 percent of surveyed shooters say they still aren?t members.

Top reasons for joining a range or sporting clays club included:

  • 36 % said they are not interested or have no need to join
  • 25 % said it is too expensive
  • 22 % said they have another nearby range that is open to the public or free of cost
  • 20 % said the nearest range or club is too far
  • 16 % did not identify a specific reason only citing ?other?
  • 6 % said nearby ranges or clubs did not offer the type of shooting that interests them
  • 4 % said they do not feel welcome there.

?While it may be difficult to overcome some of the reasons people cite for not joining a local shooting club, facilities can make inroads with new shooters by being sure they offer quality instruction, make new shooters, particularly women, feel welcome, and create fun, inexpensive events and competitions that build the value of ?belonging,?? said Rob Southwick, president of Southwick Associates, which designs and conducts the surveys at HunterSurvey.com, ShooterSurvey.com and AnglerSurvey.com.

Of those shooters who are members of a range or sporting clays club, ShooterSurvey.com explored what those people would like to see improved or offered at their shooting range?some ideas of which may also encourage new members to join.

Top responses included:

  • 22 % want more shooting benches or target stations
  • 17 % want more competitions
  • 12 % want more shooting benches or equipment that better fit women and youth
  • 13 % want more/cleaner restrooms
  • 10 % want improved food/beverage options.

Of those surveyed, 44 percent didn?t want anything changed at their range or club as they are happy with it the way it is, an eight percent increase in satisfaction over the 36 percent respondents reported last year?a sign that more ranges are working at and succeeding at meeting the needs of their shooting public.

To help continually improve, protect and advance the shooting sports and outdoor recreation, all sportsmen and sportswomen are encouraged to participate in the surveys at HunterSurvey.com, ShooterSurvey.com and/or AnglerSurvey.com. Each month, participants who complete the survey are entered into a drawing for one of five $100 gift certificates to the sporting goods retailer of their choice.

About AnglerSurvey.com, HunterSurvey.com and ShooterSurvey.com:
Launched in 2006, AnglerSurvey.com, HunterSurvey.com and ShooterSurvey.com help the outdoor equipment industry, government fisheries and wildlife officials and conservation organizations track consumer activities and expenditure trends. Survey results are scientifically analyzed to reflect the attitudes and habits of anglers and hunters across the United States. Follow them on

  • Facebook at http://facebook.com/huntersurvey and http://facebook.com/anglersurvey
  • Twitter at https://twitter.com/#!/AnglerSurvey and https://twitter.com/#!/HunterSurvey

Source: http://www.ammoland.com/2012/10/22/membership-in-shooting-ranges-sporting-clays-clubs-increases/

reason rally mad hatter azerbaijan ryan howard ps i love you ray charles cheney heart transplant

Sunday, October 21, 2012

How a fish 'broke' a law of physics

ScienceDaily (Oct. 21, 2012) ? Silvery fish such as herring, sardine and sprat are breaking a basic law of physics, according to new research from the University of Bristol published October 21 in Nature Photonics.

Reflective surfaces polarize light, a phenomenon that fishermen or photographers overcome by using polarizing sunglasses or polarizing filters to cut our reflective glare. However, PhD student Tom Jordan and his supervisors Professor Julian Partridge and Dr Nicholas Roberts in Bristol's School of Biological Sciences found that these silvery fish have overcome this basic law of reflection -- an adaptation that may help them evade predators.

Previously, it was thought that the fish's skin -- which contains "multilayer" arrangements of reflective guanine crystals -- would fully polarize light when reflected. As the light becomes polarized, there should be a drop in reflectivity.

The Bristol researchers found that the skin of sardines and herring contain not one but two types of guanine crystal -- each with different optical properties. By mixing these two types, the fish's skin doesn't polarize the reflected light and maintains its high reflectivity.

Dr Roberts said: "We believe these species of fish have evolved this particular multilayer structure to help conceal them from predators, such as dolphin and tuna. These fish have found a way to maximize their reflectivity over all angles they are viewed from. This helps the fish best match the light environment of the open ocean, making them less likely to be seen."

As a result of this ability, the skin of silvery fish could hold the key to better optical devices. Tom Jordan said: "Many modern day optical devices such as LED lights and low loss optical fibres use these non-polarizing types of reflectors to improve efficiency. However, these human-made reflectors currently require the use of materials with specific optical properties that are not always ideal. The mechanism that has evolved in fish overcomes this current design limitation and provides a new way to manufacture these non-polarizing reflectors."

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:


Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by University of Bristol.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: Views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/most_popular/~3/7_bS-SJCv4w/121021133911.htm

Olympics Opening Ceremony abc paris jackson paris jackson Katherine Jackson Olympics Opening Ceremony Time aapl

Drugs in the Italian air are nothing to snort at

WHEN in Rome, you get a little hit of cocaine with every breath.

A study of psychotropic drug levels in ambient air from eight Italian cities found background levels of cocaine, cannabinoids - the active ingredients in marijuana - nicotine and caffeine in every urban centre.

Turin had the highest concentrations of cocaine, says Angelo Cecinato at the Institute of Atmospheric Pollution Research in Rome. Meanwhile, Bologna and Florence had some of the highest cannabinoid levels, which Cecinato attributes to the large student populations in the two cities. The drug concentrations are much too low to have an effect, though (Environmental Pollution, doi.org/jhk).

If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.

Have your say

Only subscribers may leave comments on this article. Please log in.

Only personal subscribers may leave comments on this article

Subscribe now to comment.

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

Source: http://feeds.newscientist.com/c/749/f/10897/s/24afbdaa/l/0L0Snewscientist0N0Carticle0Cmg216288740B60A0A0Edrugs0Ein0Ethe0Eitalian0Eair0Eare0Enothing0Eto0Esnort0Eat0Bhtml0Dcmpid0FRSS0QNSNS0Q20A120EGLOBAL0Qonline0Enews/story01.htm

Heather Clem Romney abc news ray lewis detroit tigers Bosses Day 2012 Arlen Specter

George McGovern dies; lost 1972 presidential bid

FILE - In this July 14, 1972 file photo, Sen. George S. McGovern makes his acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention in Miami Beach. At left is his running mate, Sen. Thomas F. Eagleton of Missouri, and at right, convention chairman Lawrence F. O'Brien. A family spokesman says, McGovern, the Democrat who lost to President Richard Nixon in 1972 in a historic landslide, has died at the age of 90. According to the spokesman, McGovern died Sunday, Oct. 21, 2012 at a hospice in Sioux Falls, surrounded by family and friends. (AP Photo)

FILE - In this July 14, 1972 file photo, Sen. George S. McGovern makes his acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention in Miami Beach. At left is his running mate, Sen. Thomas F. Eagleton of Missouri, and at right, convention chairman Lawrence F. O'Brien. A family spokesman says, McGovern, the Democrat who lost to President Richard Nixon in 1972 in a historic landslide, has died at the age of 90. According to the spokesman, McGovern died Sunday, Oct. 21, 2012 at a hospice in Sioux Falls, surrounded by family and friends. (AP Photo)

FILE - In this July 14, 1972 file photo, Sen. George S. McGovern with his wife, Eleanor, and Sen. Thomas F. Eagleton with his wife, Barbara Ann, stand before the Democratic National Convention delegates who chose them to try to capture the White House from President Richard Nixon in Miami. A family spokesman says, McGovern, the Democrat who lost to President Richard Nixon in 1972 in a historic landslide, has died at the age of 90. According to the spokesman, McGovern died Sunday, Oct. 21, 2012 at a hospice in Sioux Falls, surrounded by family and friends. (AP Photo)

FILE - In this undated file photo, Sen. George McGovern sits in the cockpit of a training plane. A family spokesman says, McGovern, the Democrat who lost to President Richard Nixon in 1972 in a historic landslide, has died at the age of 90. According to the spokesman, McGovern died Sunday, Oct. 21, 2012 at a hospice in Sioux Falls, surrounded by family and friends.(AP Photo, File)

FILE - In this Feb. 23, 1984 file photo, Rev. Jesse Jackson, left, and former Sen. George McGovern both gesture during the Democratic presidential debate in Manchester, N.H. A family spokesman says, McGovern, the Democrat who lost to President Richard Nixon in 1972 in a historic landslide, has died at the age of 90. According to the spokesman, McGovern died Sunday, Oct. 21, 2012 at a hospice in Sioux Falls, surrounded by family and friends.(AP Photo, File)

FILE - In this March 10, 1969 file photo, Rosalie Bryant holds her two year old son, Gregory Michael as she talks to Senators George McGovern, D-S.D., right and Jacob Javits, R-N.Y., in Immokalee, Fla. A family spokesman says, McGovern, the Democrat who lost to President Richard Nixon in 1972 in a historic landslide, has died at the age of 90. According to the spokesman, McGovern died Sunday, Oct. 21, 2012 at a hospice in Sioux Falls, surrounded by family and friends.(AP Photo/Jim Bourdier, File)

(AP) ? George McGovern once joked that he had wanted to run for president in the worst way ? and that he had done so.

It was a campaign in 1972 dishonored by Watergate, a scandal that fully unfurled too late to knock Republican President Richard M. Nixon from his place as a commanding favorite for re-election. The South Dakota senator tried to make an issue out of the bungled attempt to wiretap the offices of the Democratic National Committee, calling Nixon the most corrupt president in history.

But the Democrat could not escape the embarrassing missteps of his own campaign. The most torturous was the selection of Missouri Sen. Thomas F. Eagleton as the vice presidential nominee and, 18 days later, following the disclosure that Eagleton had undergone electroshock therapy for depression, the decision to drop him from the ticket despite having pledged to back him "1,000 percent."

It was at once the most memorable and the most damaging line of his campaign, and called "possibly the most single damaging faux pas ever made by a presidential candidate" by the late political writer Theodore H. White.

After a hard day's campaigning ? Nixon did virtually none ? McGovern would complain to those around him that nobody was paying attention. With R. Sargent Shriver as his running mate, he went on to carry only Massachusetts and the District of Columbia, winning just 38 percent of the popular vote in one of the biggest landslides losses in American presidential history.

"Tom and I ran into a little snag back in 1972 that in the light of my much advanced wisdom today, I think was vastly exaggerated," McGovern said at an event with Eagleton in 2005. Noting that Nixon and his running mate, Spiro Agnew, would both ultimately resign, he joked, "If we had run in '74 instead of '72, it would have been a piece of cake."

A proud liberal who had argued fervently against the Vietnam War as a Democratic senator from South Dakota and three-time candidate for president, McGovern died at 5:15 a.m. Sunday at a Sioux Falls hospice, family spokesman Steve Hildebrand told The Associated Press. McGovern was 90.

McGovern's family had said late last week that McGovern had become unresponsive while in hospice care, and Hildebrand said he was surrounded by family and lifelong friends when he died.

"We are blessed to know that our father lived a long, successful and productive life advocating for the hungry, being a progressive voice for millions and fighting for peace. He continued giving speeches, writing and advising all the way up to and past his 90th birthday, which he celebrated this summer," the family said in the statement.

A funeral will be held in Sioux Falls, with details announced soon, Hildebrand said.

A decorated World War II bomber pilot, McGovern said he learned to hate war by waging it. In his disastrous race against Nixon, he promised to end the Vietnam War and cut defense spending by billions of dollars. He helped create the Food for Peace program and spent much of his career believing the United States should be more accommodating to the former Soviet Union.

Never a showman, he made his case with a style as plain as the prairies where he grew up, sounding often more like the Methodist minister he'd once studied to become than longtime U.S. senator and three-time candidate for president he became.

And he never shied from the word "liberal," even as other Democrats blanched at the word and Republicans used it as an epithet.

"I am a liberal and always have been," McGovern said in 2001. "Just not the wild-eyed character the Republicans made me out to be."

McGovern's campaign, nevertheless, left a lasting imprint on American politics. Determined not to make the same mistake, presidential nominees have since interviewed and intensely investigated their choices for vice president. Former President Bill Clinton got his start in politics when he signed on as a campaign worker for McGovern in 1972 and is among the legion of Democrats who credit him with inspiring them to public service.

"I believe no other presidential candidate ever has had such an enduring impact in defeat," Clinton said in 2006 at the dedication of McGovern's library in Mitchell, S.D. "Senator, the fires you lit then still burn in countless hearts."

George Stanley McGovern was born on July 19, 1922, in the small farm town of Avon, S.D, the son of a Methodist pastor. He was raised in Mitchell, shy and quiet until he was recruited for the high school debate team and found his niche. He enrolled at Dakota Wesleyan University in his hometown and, already a private pilot, volunteered for the Army Air Force soon after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.

The Army didn't have enough airfields or training planes to take him until 1943. He married his wife, Eleanor Stegeberg, and arrived in Italy the next year. That would be his base for the 35 missions he flew in the B-24 Liberator christened the "Dakota Queen" after his new bride.

In a December 1944 bombing raid on the Czech city of Pilsen, McGovern's plane was hit by anti-aircraft fire that disabled one engine and set fire to another. He nursed the B-24 back to a British airfield on an island in the Adriatic Sea, earning the Distinguished Flying Cross. On his final mission, his plane was hit several times, but he managed to get it back safety ? one of the actions for which he received the Air Medal.

McGovern returned to Mitchell and graduated from Dakota Wesleyan after the war's end, and after a year of divinity school, switched to the study of history and political science at Northwestern University. He earned his master's and doctoral degrees, returned to Dakota Wesleyan to teach history and government, and switched from his family's Republican roots to the Democratic Party.

"I think it was my study of history that convinced me that the Democratic Party was more on the side of the average American," he said.

In the early 1950s, Democrats held no major offices in South Dakota and only a handful of legislative seats. McGovern, who had gotten into Democratic politics as a campaign volunteer, left teaching in 1953 to become executive secretary of the South Dakota Democratic Party. Three years later, he won an upset election to the House; he served two terms and left to run for Senate.

Challenging conservative Republican Sen. Karl Mundt in 1960, he lost what he called his "worst campaign." He said later that he'd hated Mundt so much that he'd lost his sense of balance.

President John F. Kennedy named McGovern head of the Food for Peace program, which sends U.S. commodities to deprived areas around the world. He made a second Senate bid in 1962, unseating Sen. Joe Bottum by just 597 votes. He was the first Democrat elected to the U.S. Senate from South Dakota since 1930.

In his first year in office, McGovern took to the Senate floor to say that the Vietnam war was a trap that would haunt the United States ? a speech that drew little notice. He voted the following August in favor of the Gulf of Tonkin resolution under which President Lyndon B. Johnson escalated the U.S. war in the southeast Asian nation.

While McGovern continued to vote to pay for the war, he did so while speaking against it. As the war escalated, so did his opposition. Late in 1969, McGovern called for a cease-fire in Vietnam and the withdrawal of all U.S. troops within a year. He later co-sponsored a Senate amendment to cut off appropriations for the war by the end of 1971. It failed, but not before McGovern had taken the floor to declare "this chamber reeks of blood" and to demand an end to "this damnable war."

President Barack Obama remembered McGovern in a statement Sunday as "a statesman of great conscience and conviction."

"He signed up to fight in World War II, and became a decorated bomber pilot over the battlefields of Europe," the president said. "When the people of South Dakota sent him to Washington, this hero of war became a champion for peace. And after his career in Congress, he became a leading voice in the fight against hunger."

McGovern first sought the Democratic presidential nomination late in the 1968 campaign, saying he would take up the cause of the assassinated Sen. Robert F. Kennedy. He finished far behind Vice President Hubert H. Humphrey, who won the nomination, and Minnesota Sen. Eugene McCarthy, who had led the anti-war challenge to Johnson in the primaries earlier in the year. McGovern later called his bid an "anti-organization" effort against the Humphrey steamroller.

"At least I have precluded the possibility of peaking too early," McGovern quipped at the time.

The following year, McGovern led a Democratic Party reform commission that shifted to voters' power that had been wielded by party leaders and bosses at the national conventions. The result was the system of presidential primary elections and caucuses that now selects the Democratic and Republican presidential nominees.

In 1972, McGovern ran under the rules he had helped write. Initially considered a longshot against Sen. Edmund S. Muskie of Maine, McGovern built a bottom-up campaign organization and went to the Democratic national convention in command. He was the first candidate to gain a nominating majority in the primaries before the convention.

It was a meeting filled with intramural wrangling and speeches that verged on filibusters. By the time McGovern delivered his climactic speech accepting the nomination, it was 2:48 a.m., and with most of America asleep, he lost his last and best chance to make his case to a nationwide audience.

McGovern did not know before selecting Eagleton of his running mate's mental health woes, and after dropping him from the ticket, struggled to find a replacement. Several Democrats said no, and a joke made the rounds that there was a signup sheet in the Senate cloakroom. Shriver, a member of the Kennedy family, finally agreed.

The campaign limped into the fall on a platform advocating withdrawal from Vietnam in exchange for the release of POWs, cutting defense spending by a third and establishing an income floor for all Americans. McGovern had dropped an early proposal to give every American $1,000 a year, but the Republicans continued to ridicule it as "the demogrant." They painted McGovern as an extreme leftist and Democrats as the party of "amnesty, abortion and acid."

While McGovern said little about his decorated service in World War II, Republicans depicted him as a weak peace activist. At one point, McGovern was forced to defend himself against assertions he had shirked combat.

He'd had enough when a young man at the airport fence in Battle Creek, Mich., taunted that Nixon would clobber him. McGovern leaned in and said quietly: "I've got a secret for you. Kiss my ass." A conservative Senate colleague later told McGovern it was his best line of the campaign.

Defeated by Nixon, McGovern returned to the Senate and pressed there to end the Vietnam war while championing agriculture, anti-hunger and food stamp programs in the United States and food programs abroad. He won re-election to the Senate in 1974, by which point he could make wry jokes about his presidential defeat.

"For many years, I wanted to run for the presidency in the worst possible way ? and last year, I sure did," he told a formal press dinner in Washington.

After losing his bid for a fourth Senate term in the 1980 Republican landslide that made Ronald Reagan president, McGovern went on to teach and lecture at universities, and found a liberal political action committee. He made a longshot bid in the 1984 presidential race with a call to end U.S. military involvement in Lebanon and Central America and open arms talks with the Soviets. Former Vice President Walter Mondale won the Democratic nomination and went on to lose to President Ronald Reagan by an even bigger margin in electoral votes than had McGovern to Nixon.

He talked of running a final time for president in 1992, but decided it was time for somebody younger and with fewer political scars.

After his career in office ended, McGovern served as U.S. ambassador to the Rome-based United Nation's food agencies from 1998 to 2001 and spent his later years working to feed needy children around the world. He and former Republican Sen. Bob Dole collaborated to create an international food for education and child nutrition program, for which they shared the 2008 World Food Prize.

Clinton and his wife, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, said in a statement Sunday that while McGovern was "a tireless advocate for human rights and dignity," his greatest passion was helping feed the hungry.

"The programs he created helped feed millions of people, including food stamps in the 1960s and the international school feeding program in the 90's, both of which he co-sponsored with Senator Bob Dole," they said, adding, "We must continue to draw inspiration from his example and build the world he fought for."

McGovern's opposition to armed conflict remained a constant long after he retired. Shortly before Iowa's caucuses in 2004, McGovern endorsed retired Gen. Wesley Clark, and compared his own opposition to the Vietnam War to Clark's criticism of President George W. Bush's decision to wage war in Iraq. One of the 10 books McGovern wrote was 2006's "Out of Iraq: A Practical Plan for Withdrawal Now," written with William R. Polk.

In early 2002, George and Eleanor McGovern returned to Mitchell, where they helped raise money for a library bearing their names. Eleanor McGovern died there in 2007 at age 85; they had been married 64 years, and had four daughters and a son.

"I don't know what kind of president I would have been, but Eleanor would have been a great first lady," he said after his wife's death in 2007.

One of their daughters, Teresa, was found dead in a Madison, Wis., snowdrift in 1994 after battling alcoholism for years. He recounted her struggle in his 1996 book "Terry," and described the writing of it as "the most painful undertaking in my life." It was briefly a best seller and he used the proceeds to help set up a treatment center for victims of alcoholism and mental illness in Madison.

Before the 2008 presidential campaign, McGovern endorsed Sen. Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination but switched to Barack Obama that May. He called the future president "a moderate," cautious in his ways, who wouldn't waste money or do "anything reckless."

"I think Barack will emerge as one of our great ones," he said in a 2009 interview with The Associated Press. "It will be a victory for moderate liberalism."

___

Online:

McGovern Center for Leadership and Public Service: http://www.mcgoverncenter.com

___

EDITOR'S NOTE ? Walter R. Mears, who reported on government and politics for The Associated Press in Washington for 40 years, covered George McGovern in the Senate and in his 1972 presidential campaign.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/89ae8247abe8493fae24405546e9a1aa/Article_2012-10-21-Obit-McGovern/id-a20f9d2a51774b07af5cf63ca8df3c36

shamrock slainte the quiet man yellow cab dropkick murphys guernsey nit